<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The October 8th Broadcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mormonsformarriage.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=43" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43</link>
	<description>Voicing our support for same-sex marriage, and our respectful opposition to California’s Proposition 8</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43&cpage=1#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43#comment-1017</guid>
		<description>Bro. and Sis. 

I came to this site to better understand feelings and thoughts that accompany the opposition to Prop 8 from members in the church.  I do not live in California, but if I did I would be voting for Prop 8. While I can not speak for others like myself, who would vote like wise, I can speak for myself; and say I WOULD NOT vote, if given the opportunity to vote,  for Prop 8 out of hate or malice. Rather I would vote for Prop 8 because I desire to do what the Lord has asked of me. This issue is a delicate one, cutting to the very core of our beliefs, one where there can be no fence sitting. If one understands the mind of GOD and Christ then one can better understand Gods will. If one understands his mind then one understands  that HE has appointed leaders to use HIS resources in defending HIS purposes. While I am not in the heads of those who have posted here, from what I have been reading it seems to me that many have forgotten that this IS Gods church NOT the worlds or mens. What the Lord desires of us will not, in most circumstances, be popular or politically correct. God has appointed mouth pieces to speak for him in the form of our First presidency and 12 Apostles. We have also sustained them to their specific callings. The Lord WILL NOT! allow them to lead us astray. If they were to try to do so HE would immediately remove them from their spot. That said I also know that I can personally talk to God and have confirmed by the Spirit those things which I have been taught by my leaders to do. Just as the Lord confirmed to Nephi the dream that his Father had had. When Nephi asked to know and understand what his Father had been shown the Lord did not say "no, I don't think so you're just going to have to rely on what I told your Father". He taught Nephi, through the Spirit, what he had taught his Father. Keywords being "through the Spirit". Which would imply that the petitioner would need to be prepared to receive and listen to the Spirit and its promptings. My point being, that so far as knowing whether supporting prop 8 is truly the mind of God all one has to do is EARNESTLY pray to God and then PONDER over in their hearts to receive the burning in their bosom(chest) if this is Gods will. If then having received this confirmation it still can not be understood why the Lord would want one to vote for something that seems to be hateful, ignorant, outdated or any other number of other terms that could be used; one must then ask themselves do they trust him or not. I respect that this is a very personal decision and that in the end all will vote their mind and/or their conscience but I pray that those who who read this post will be open to accepting my challenge and ask the Lord for themselves in voting for Prop 8 if it is right and then asking for the strength to vote based on their response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bro. and Sis. </p>
<p>I came to this site to better understand feelings and thoughts that accompany the opposition to Prop 8 from members in the church.  I do not live in California, but if I did I would be voting for Prop 8. While I can not speak for others like myself, who would vote like wise, I can speak for myself; and say I WOULD NOT vote, if given the opportunity to vote,  for Prop 8 out of hate or malice. Rather I would vote for Prop 8 because I desire to do what the Lord has asked of me. This issue is a delicate one, cutting to the very core of our beliefs, one where there can be no fence sitting. If one understands the mind of GOD and Christ then one can better understand Gods will. If one understands his mind then one understands  that HE has appointed leaders to use HIS resources in defending HIS purposes. While I am not in the heads of those who have posted here, from what I have been reading it seems to me that many have forgotten that this IS Gods church NOT the worlds or mens. What the Lord desires of us will not, in most circumstances, be popular or politically correct. God has appointed mouth pieces to speak for him in the form of our First presidency and 12 Apostles. We have also sustained them to their specific callings. The Lord WILL NOT! allow them to lead us astray. If they were to try to do so HE would immediately remove them from their spot. That said I also know that I can personally talk to God and have confirmed by the Spirit those things which I have been taught by my leaders to do. Just as the Lord confirmed to Nephi the dream that his Father had had. When Nephi asked to know and understand what his Father had been shown the Lord did not say &#8220;no, I don&#8217;t think so you&#8217;re just going to have to rely on what I told your Father&#8221;. He taught Nephi, through the Spirit, what he had taught his Father. Keywords being &#8220;through the Spirit&#8221;. Which would imply that the petitioner would need to be prepared to receive and listen to the Spirit and its promptings. My point being, that so far as knowing whether supporting prop 8 is truly the mind of God all one has to do is EARNESTLY pray to God and then PONDER over in their hearts to receive the burning in their bosom(chest) if this is Gods will. If then having received this confirmation it still can not be understood why the Lord would want one to vote for something that seems to be hateful, ignorant, outdated or any other number of other terms that could be used; one must then ask themselves do they trust him or not. I respect that this is a very personal decision and that in the end all will vote their mind and/or their conscience but I pray that those who who read this post will be open to accepting my challenge and ask the Lord for themselves in voting for Prop 8 if it is right and then asking for the strength to vote based on their response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43&cpage=1#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43#comment-738</guid>
		<description>Natalie,

Though I cannot comment with any great knowledge about the specific case which you bring up, I must agree that there are many issues that the prophets have spoken on that we have not lived as a people to their perfection.  If it were otherwise, the saints would have established Zion in Missouri and we would never have been required to endure the exodus west. 

However, our failure to adhere to the prophets words in one area do not dismiss or justify or failing to do so in another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Natalie,</p>
<p>Though I cannot comment with any great knowledge about the specific case which you bring up, I must agree that there are many issues that the prophets have spoken on that we have not lived as a people to their perfection.  If it were otherwise, the saints would have established Zion in Missouri and we would never have been required to endure the exodus west. </p>
<p>However, our failure to adhere to the prophets words in one area do not dismiss or justify or failing to do so in another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43&cpage=1#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43#comment-696</guid>
		<description>Erik,
I think that history has shown that certain announcements by the church often fall by the wayside. For example, the Proclamation on the Family was not the first such proclamation issued by the church. Back in 1875, they issued the Proclamation on the Economy. Part of it states: 

"One of the great evils with which our own nation is menaced at the present time is the wonderful growth of wealth in the hands of a comparatively few individuals.... If this evil should not be checked, and measures not taken to prevent the continued enormous growth of riches among the class already rich, and the painful increase of destitution and want among the poor, the nation is likely to be overtaken by disaster; for, according to history, such a tendency among nations once powerful was the sure precursor of ruin. "

This was signed by all members of the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve, and was also sustained by the general body of the church; this makes it official doctrine. But how many saints are heeding those warnings? I would love to see these doctrines enacted more fully. I think poverty is a much more serious moral issue than gay marriage. Why has the church stopped speaking up on these important issues? Why don't members live up to these standards? 

Many saints want to claim that gay marriage will tear apart society and bring about the downfall of our country. For myself, I have much more fear for the twin evils of greed and want. Many of us feel dismayed that the church, which has the potential for so much influence, has chosen to direct that influence towards something that takes away the freedom of others. 

I find it immensely hard to believe that homosexuals having equal rights is the greatest threat to our morality at this time. Perhaps I wouldn't be so put off by the church's stance on Prop. 8 if they were devoting equal attention to other moral political causes that affect far more people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erik,<br />
I think that history has shown that certain announcements by the church often fall by the wayside. For example, the Proclamation on the Family was not the first such proclamation issued by the church. Back in 1875, they issued the Proclamation on the Economy. Part of it states: </p>
<p>&#8220;One of the great evils with which our own nation is menaced at the present time is the wonderful growth of wealth in the hands of a comparatively few individuals&#8230;. If this evil should not be checked, and measures not taken to prevent the continued enormous growth of riches among the class already rich, and the painful increase of destitution and want among the poor, the nation is likely to be overtaken by disaster; for, according to history, such a tendency among nations once powerful was the sure precursor of ruin. &#8221;</p>
<p>This was signed by all members of the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve, and was also sustained by the general body of the church; this makes it official doctrine. But how many saints are heeding those warnings? I would love to see these doctrines enacted more fully. I think poverty is a much more serious moral issue than gay marriage. Why has the church stopped speaking up on these important issues? Why don&#8217;t members live up to these standards? </p>
<p>Many saints want to claim that gay marriage will tear apart society and bring about the downfall of our country. For myself, I have much more fear for the twin evils of greed and want. Many of us feel dismayed that the church, which has the potential for so much influence, has chosen to direct that influence towards something that takes away the freedom of others. </p>
<p>I find it immensely hard to believe that homosexuals having equal rights is the greatest threat to our morality at this time. Perhaps I wouldn&#8217;t be so put off by the church&#8217;s stance on Prop. 8 if they were devoting equal attention to other moral political causes that affect far more people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43&cpage=1#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43#comment-690</guid>
		<description>MarcLux: 

I only mean to state what I understand to be some of the most fundamental beliefs of the Mormon faith. 

"We believe all that God has revealed, all that He does now reveal, and we believe that He will yet reveal many great and important things pertaining to the Kingdom of God." –Article of Faith 9

After the death of Joseph, the quorum of the twelve led the church under the direction of Brigham Young.  Eventually, Brigham and the entire quorum were gathered at the same place long enough to meet together, and Brigham proposed that they re-establish the first presidency.  Wilford Woodruff was uncertain of the initiative and there was some debate over the issue.  At last, in a unified effort, the quorum sustained Brigham Young as President of the Church.  The quorum of the twelve has the right and even the responsibility to question and discuss decisions that most be made regarding the Lord's church.  However, when action takes place, it is only by unanimous consent.  Hugh B Brown's position in favor of rescinding the "negro doctrine" was not in opposition to President McKay or the Lord.  The prophets had gone to the Lord for decades asking about the issue, and the Lord had not spoken yet.  And when the Lord had spoken, the change was promptly made.

Unlike the circumstances surrounding Hugh B Brown, the Lord has spoken on the issue of marriage as stated in The Family: A Proclamation to the World. The Apostles acting on assignment are doing so in unison according to the truths that have been revealed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MarcLux: </p>
<p>I only mean to state what I understand to be some of the most fundamental beliefs of the Mormon faith. </p>
<p>&#8220;We believe all that God has revealed, all that He does now reveal, and we believe that He will yet reveal many great and important things pertaining to the Kingdom of God.&#8221; –Article of Faith 9</p>
<p>After the death of Joseph, the quorum of the twelve led the church under the direction of Brigham Young.  Eventually, Brigham and the entire quorum were gathered at the same place long enough to meet together, and Brigham proposed that they re-establish the first presidency.  Wilford Woodruff was uncertain of the initiative and there was some debate over the issue.  At last, in a unified effort, the quorum sustained Brigham Young as President of the Church.  The quorum of the twelve has the right and even the responsibility to question and discuss decisions that most be made regarding the Lord&#8217;s church.  However, when action takes place, it is only by unanimous consent.  Hugh B Brown&#8217;s position in favor of rescinding the &#8220;negro doctrine&#8221; was not in opposition to President McKay or the Lord.  The prophets had gone to the Lord for decades asking about the issue, and the Lord had not spoken yet.  And when the Lord had spoken, the change was promptly made.</p>
<p>Unlike the circumstances surrounding Hugh B Brown, the Lord has spoken on the issue of marriage as stated in The Family: A Proclamation to the World. The Apostles acting on assignment are doing so in unison according to the truths that have been revealed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43&cpage=1#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43#comment-659</guid>
		<description>That revelations appear which show the Lord's expectation of changed behavior (e.g. the fulfillment of the Law of Moses with the resurrection of Christ, and the consequent change in practices) does not mean that any preceding revelation is/was false. If Hugh B. Brown spoke out against what he thought was a bad Church policy does not absolve us of the responsibility of abiding the counsel and instruction of our Church leaders. The Lord revealed his will definitively in due time. That's the essence of Church membership. If you don't believe that, that's fine. But as Erik alluded, you either believe in the unbroken line of priesthood authority or you don't. Being a Mormon, but casting aside the Apostles is something of paradox.

The First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve are instructing us to support Yes on 8. Not just a few rogues. I sympathize with those of you that have suffered and watched others suffer because they have grappled with temptation and sin. Surely the Lord is conscious of the pain. But so is the Adversary, and he is, evidently, making the most of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That revelations appear which show the Lord&#8217;s expectation of changed behavior (e.g. the fulfillment of the Law of Moses with the resurrection of Christ, and the consequent change in practices) does not mean that any preceding revelation is/was false. If Hugh B. Brown spoke out against what he thought was a bad Church policy does not absolve us of the responsibility of abiding the counsel and instruction of our Church leaders. The Lord revealed his will definitively in due time. That&#8217;s the essence of Church membership. If you don&#8217;t believe that, that&#8217;s fine. But as Erik alluded, you either believe in the unbroken line of priesthood authority or you don&#8217;t. Being a Mormon, but casting aside the Apostles is something of paradox.</p>
<p>The First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve are instructing us to support Yes on 8. Not just a few rogues. I sympathize with those of you that have suffered and watched others suffer because they have grappled with temptation and sin. Surely the Lord is conscious of the pain. But so is the Adversary, and he is, evidently, making the most of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin3</title>
		<link>http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43&cpage=1#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>admin3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43#comment-655</guid>
		<description>We must be getting close to election day, because with the heated emotions, folks seem to be forgetting &lt;a href="http://mormonsformarriage.com/?page_id=21" rel="nofollow"&gt;our comment policy&lt;/a&gt;.

Just a reminder folks that we can debate issues without attacking one another, issuing calls for repentance, or swearing. If you want your posts to get through, please keep that in mind.

We’ll keep this thread open as long as people can treat one another with the respect they deserve as sons and daughters of Deity.

Let us do what we can now to help one another by listening and reading with open hearts and minds, by speaking and writing about our beliefs with respect and by being true under-shepherds for Christ, searching out and comforting those who need it the most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We must be getting close to election day, because with the heated emotions, folks seem to be forgetting <a href="http://mormonsformarriage.com/?page_id=21"  rel="nofollow">our comment policy</a>.</p>
<p>Just a reminder folks that we can debate issues without attacking one another, issuing calls for repentance, or swearing. If you want your posts to get through, please keep that in mind.</p>
<p>We’ll keep this thread open as long as people can treat one another with the respect they deserve as sons and daughters of Deity.</p>
<p>Let us do what we can now to help one another by listening and reading with open hearts and minds, by speaking and writing about our beliefs with respect and by being true under-shepherds for Christ, searching out and comforting those who need it the most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarcLux</title>
		<link>http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43&cpage=1#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>MarcLux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43#comment-647</guid>
		<description>Erik:

Surely you can't believe that in the unbroken line of apostles there have not been revelations that have been changed and even overruled over time.  See Hugh B Brown for starters.  Men are human, and can make mistakes even with what appears to be revealed truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erik:</p>
<p>Surely you can&#8217;t believe that in the unbroken line of apostles there have not been revelations that have been changed and even overruled over time.  See Hugh B Brown for starters.  Men are human, and can make mistakes even with what appears to be revealed truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43&cpage=1#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43#comment-633</guid>
		<description>Amen Erik.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen Erik.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43&cpage=1#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 01:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43#comment-625</guid>
		<description>After reading several of the comments posted above, I'm truly confused at some of the positions expressed.  Regardless of all that we don't know about God's plan, there are some things that according to our faith we do know.  Central to our religion is the fundamental link between God and man through holy inspired prophets.  Scriptures are the material evidence of this primary connection, they being written by prophets under the inspiration of God.  It is by scriptures and the mouth of prophets that we come to know the will of God.

That being said, this is a church of faith.  Just as Jesus required the faith of the sick that they could be healed in his day, he requires our faith so that he can heal us today.  Following the prophets is essential for the Kingdom of God to be established in any dispensation.  It is not a matter of blind obedience, but rather faithful dedication.

Perhaps the hardest test we face in this life is following the counsel of our priesthood leaders, even when we do not understand or know all of the reasons behind they actions.  Our identity as Latter-day Saints is defined by our belief in the restoration of the gospel of Jesus Christ through divinely appointed prophets and apostles.  Though imperfect they may be, when acting in the name of the church the Lord has promised us we will not be led astray.

If we believe that Joseph Smith was a prophet, truly called and ordained by God, we must necessarily believe that the doctrine that he taught is true, that the line of prophets and apostles from his day to ours has remained unbroken, and that Thomas S. Monson is a true and living prophet today, bound be the Lord to speak the truth, nothing wavering.  To try and separate these truths and believe that we can sensor the words of the prophet is to deny the faith, the church, and the doctrines for which it stands.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading several of the comments posted above, I&#8217;m truly confused at some of the positions expressed.  Regardless of all that we don&#8217;t know about God&#8217;s plan, there are some things that according to our faith we do know.  Central to our religion is the fundamental link between God and man through holy inspired prophets.  Scriptures are the material evidence of this primary connection, they being written by prophets under the inspiration of God.  It is by scriptures and the mouth of prophets that we come to know the will of God.</p>
<p>That being said, this is a church of faith.  Just as Jesus required the faith of the sick that they could be healed in his day, he requires our faith so that he can heal us today.  Following the prophets is essential for the Kingdom of God to be established in any dispensation.  It is not a matter of blind obedience, but rather faithful dedication.</p>
<p>Perhaps the hardest test we face in this life is following the counsel of our priesthood leaders, even when we do not understand or know all of the reasons behind they actions.  Our identity as Latter-day Saints is defined by our belief in the restoration of the gospel of Jesus Christ through divinely appointed prophets and apostles.  Though imperfect they may be, when acting in the name of the church the Lord has promised us we will not be led astray.</p>
<p>If we believe that Joseph Smith was a prophet, truly called and ordained by God, we must necessarily believe that the doctrine that he taught is true, that the line of prophets and apostles from his day to ours has remained unbroken, and that Thomas S. Monson is a true and living prophet today, bound be the Lord to speak the truth, nothing wavering.  To try and separate these truths and believe that we can sensor the words of the prophet is to deny the faith, the church, and the doctrines for which it stands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ludlow</title>
		<link>http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43&cpage=1#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>Ludlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonsformarriage.com/?p=43#comment-508</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Tolerance:
I TOLERATE people with freckles. I understand that it may be something beyond their control whether they get freckles or not.  But they could stay out of the sun/light and possibly live a freckle-free life. I want people with freckles to have the same civil rights as everybody else. But people with freckles are just different from everybody else.

I would not be surprised if because of some comment in the Bible about how spots are unclean, that my church would want to limit the salvation options of people with freckles. I would support that whole-heartedly.

Now that being said, do you think for one moment I consider people with freckles to be equal to everybody else?

All the talk of tolerance just highlights how the church considers gayness 'less than' or 'worse than' the rest. 

The church has every right to determine who should be worthy of a temple recommend and that won't change just because gays can marry, but it has no right to limit the civil rights of Californians. And it ought to stop acting like it's not being on the wrong side of civil rights, which in my book is an Evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Tolerance:<br />
I TOLERATE people with freckles. I understand that it may be something beyond their control whether they get freckles or not.  But they could stay out of the sun/light and possibly live a freckle-free life. I want people with freckles to have the same civil rights as everybody else. But people with freckles are just different from everybody else.</p>
<p>I would not be surprised if because of some comment in the Bible about how spots are unclean, that my church would want to limit the salvation options of people with freckles. I would support that whole-heartedly.</p>
<p>Now that being said, do you think for one moment I consider people with freckles to be equal to everybody else?</p>
<p>All the talk of tolerance just highlights how the church considers gayness &#8216;less than&#8217; or &#8216;worse than&#8217; the rest. </p>
<p>The church has every right to determine who should be worthy of a temple recommend and that won&#8217;t change just because gays can marry, but it has no right to limit the civil rights of Californians. And it ought to stop acting like it&#8217;s not being on the wrong side of civil rights, which in my book is an Evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
